Mite treatment for guinea pigs | Ivermectin 1%
Benefits for Farmers
Farmers who raise their animals on pasture enjoy a number of benefits including being able to raise their families in a peaceful environment and eat nutritious, all-natural food. As you will read below, they are also spared the health hazards associated with factory farming. Just as important, many farmers are able to make a living selling their pastured products directly to consumers or restaurants. As the public becomes more aware of the benefits of pastured products, thousands of small family farms may survive. Raising pigs indoors is hazardous for farm workers According to a report issued by Iowa State University, working in swine buildings can expose workers to dangerously high levels of dust, ammonia, carbon dioxide and other gasses.
The Eatwild Directory of Farmers lists dozens of suppliers of pork from pigs raised on pasture. Keeping dairy cows on pasture lowers the cost of milk production Small dairy farmers are going bankrupt by the thousands, largely due to declining milk prices. Pastured poultry and the people who raise them breathe fresh air There is a day-and-night difference between conditions in a confinement chicken operation and those on a free-range poultry farm. On a free-range farm, the chickens have room to move, grass to forage, bugs to catch, and clean air to breathe. Grassfarming attracts younger, better educated people In a 1997 survey of Pennsylvania dairy farmers, those farmers who kept their dairy cows on pasture were younger, better educated, more likely to use farm plans, and more interested in expanding their operations than farmers who kept their cows in confinement.
Raising pigs on pasture increases farmer profit and yields healthier pigs Modern agriculture has become so enamored with the feedlot system that one has to dig deep into the archives for studies that explored the alternatives. Raising dairy cows on pasture increases profit and reduces use of pesticides and oil In a study of Vermont dairy farms, farmers who raised their cows on well-managed pasture earned $579 net income per cow over two years, compared with $451 per cow in the most profitable confinement dairies.
Pigs Starved, Mutilated, and Left to Die at Darlynn’s Darlins ‘Rescue’
Now, PETA has documented that at Darlynn’s Darlins Rescue Ranch, Inc., outside Polk City, Florida, pigs weren’t given anything to eat for up to five days at a time, and then, when they were, it was often nothing but rotten scraps of produce and moldy bread. Sick, injured, and dying animals were denied veterinary care. Based on PETA’s evidence of systemic neglect and unnecessary suffering at the facility, the Polk County Sheriff’s Office executed a warrant on August 4, 2016, and seized nearly 200 animals, rescuing them from utter misery. On August 9, 2016, officials charged DDRR operators Darlynn Czerner and Clinton Martin with a total of 282 counts of cruelty to animals, including six felonies. On September 6, 2016, a judge awarded custody of 193 animals to the Polk County Sheriff’s office.
Czerner and Martin are banned from owning any animals. Spunky spent several days penned up with Buddy, a listless, emaciated pig Czerner said she would take to the vet in early June. Martin routinely denied pigs feed for up to five days and rejected numerous offers to help feed the animals. When food was provided, smaller, less assertive pigs couldn’t access it, as larger pigs dominated the few troughs available. The vertebrae, hips, and other bones protruded prominently under the skin of numerous emaciated pigs.
Even though some pigs’ hooves curled up and others’ tusks rubbed against their faces because they were so overgrown, no hoof or dental care-which are important to pigs’ health-was provided during PETA’s investigation. After a lethargic and unresponsive cat named Princess convulsed and died, Czerner admitted that she had so many animals, she was simply unable to care for them all. Instead, support professionally run, open-admission shelters that provide animals with veterinary care and, when necessary, a painless and dignified end, instead of hoarding them and letting them suffer until they die on their own, in misery.
Pigs, Hogs, and Drug Testing
At the beginning, a group of healthcare providers start utilizing a new or newly discovered CPT or HCPCS code for a test, procedure, or product. The enthusiasm of early adopters over a clinically beneficial test gives way to more and more providers pursuing the opportunity, some inevitably driven more by profit opportunity than clinical value. As the volume of claims grow, the insurance companies begin to audit for overutilization, lack of medical necessity, and excessive testing. In addition to the heightened scrutiny of claims, providers also find the reimbursement drops as the volume of the testing exapnds. A subset of providers or marketers try grow their claim volume even more aggressively, trying to cash in on a profit opportunity that they perceive to be time-limited.
As a healthcare lawyer dealing with reimbursement disputes over the past two decades, I could rattle off dozens examples of this phenomenon:diagnostic tests from nerve conduction studies and electromyography to genetic testing. Over the last eight years or so, drug testing through urine toxicology screening has been the most pervasive example of this phenomenon. Beginning around 2007, interest began to grow around the use of urine toxicology screening for injured workers being treated for pain by workers compensation providers. Addiction treatment providers have embraced urine tox screening. In the Sky Labs case, Cigna has alleged that its payments in excess of $32m for UDT were fraudulent because the labs routinely waived co-pay waivers and also because the labs induced kickbacks, by allocating investment opportunities to drug rehabs based on the volume of urine tox samples referred.
Providers would do well to take a cue from the Sky Labs allegations. Labs, addiction treatment providers, and physicians that manage all three are likely to do just fine.